Sunday, March 17, 2013

Missouri House Panel Mulls Bill on Work Discrimination Lawsuits

February 13, 2013Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetArticleComments

Republicans are hoping the third time is a charm for a measure a Missouri House committee considered that would make it harder for employees to win lawsuits alleging workplace discrimination.

Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon has vetoed similar legislation each of the last two years. But with a veto-proof Republican majority in both legislative chambers, the bill could have a different fate this year.

The measure sponsored by Rep. Kevin Elmer would require workers who file suit over an employer’s action to prove that discrimination was a

View the Original article

Courts Upholds $28 Million Award in Grand Canyon Skywalk Case

February 13, 2013Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetArticle1 Comments

A federal court dealt a blow to the business arm of a northern Arizona tribe that owns the Grand Canyon Skywalk by upholding a $28.5 million judgment in favor of a Las Vegas developer who invested the money to build the horseshoe-shaped glass bridge on tribal land.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge David Campbell rejected arguments by the Hualapai Tribe that the award isn’t enforceable, calling one of the arguments “nonsensical” and another “odd.” The American Arbitration Association had determined David Jin is owed the money, mostly for management fees that he was to receive under a 2003 contract with the tribe.

Mark Tratos, an attorney for Jin, said Monday the ruling shows U.S. citizens have recourse in contract disputes with American Indian tribes.



View the Original article

N.J. Bill Would Require Homeowners Insurers to Provide Policy Summary

January 17, 2013Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetArticle6 Comments

The New Jersey Assembly’s financial institutions and insurance committee gave approval Monday, Jan. 14, to a recently introduced bill that seeks to make it easier for homeowners to understand what their policy covers and does not cover.

The bill, A3642, would require homeowners insurers to give policyholders a one-page summary of the policy explaining “notable coverages and exclusions under the policy” that are “written in a simple, clear, understandable, and easily readable way.”

What constitutes “notable” coverages or exclusions would be determined by the state’s commissioner of banking and insurance. The copy of the proposed bill can be found at the N.J. Office of Legislative Services website (a PDF file).

Under the proposal, the one-page summary would be added into the homeowners insurance consumer information brochure provided to the policyholder when the policy is purchased or renewed. Under the current law, the homeowners insurance consumer information brochure contains information that explains the insurer’s hurricane deductible program, if any, as well as information on the National Flood Insurance Program.

The bill was introduced to help clear up some confusions reported in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. For example, many homeowners were surprised to find out about some of the exclusions when they filed Sandy claims and that the federal flood insurance from the National Flood Insurance Program is subject to certain limitations, according to a report in The Star-Ledger. The bill was sponsored by Ruben Ramos (D-Hudson), Gary Schaer (D-Bergen and Passaic), Linda Stender (D-Middlesex, Somerset and Union) and Paul Moriarty (D-Camden and Gloucester).

Committee Included Amendments to Assuage Insurers’ Concern

The Assembly’s financial institutions and insurance committee also added a couple of amendments to allay insurers’ concerns before green-lighting the measure. Insurers have expressed concern that the one-page summary might create legal vulnerabilities for insurers in cases involving potential lawsuits.

The committee tried to address that issue by adding an amendment that says the one-page summary shall explicitly state that it is only guidance and not the actual policy.

The amendment is as follows: “The summary shall not be considered a replacement for the terms of the policy of insurance, shall not have the effect of altering the coverage afforded by the policy, and shall not confer new or additional rights beyond those expressly provided for in the policy. The summary shall expressly state that the summary is only provided as guidance to the homeowner in understanding the terms of the policy of insurance.”

The committee also added an amendment that says the department of banking and insurance would decide the timeline for when the insurers would have to start providing the summary. The amendment states: “This act shall take effect on the 90th day following enactment except that the act’s provisions shall not be implemented until the Department of Banking and Insurance, by regulation, issues a timeline for implementation.”

 

Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetCategories: East NewsTopics: homeowners insurance, homeowners insurance exclusion, New Jersey insurance, Sandy, Sandy insurance claims, Sandy loss, Superstorm SandyHave a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk

View the Original article

Houston’s Chapman Schewe Now a Higginbotham Company

January 17, 2013Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetArticleComments

Higginbotham and Chapman Schewe Benefits Consulting have merged their operations in Houston.

Fort Worth, Texas-based independent insurance broker, Higginbotham, will engage Chapman Schewe to supplement the in-house consulting and administration services it provides to employee benefit clients. The addition of Chapman Schewe brings Higginbotham’s statewide office count to 17, its third in Houston.

Higginbotham, established in 1948, provides comprehensive insurance, risk management and employee benefit services to businesses and individuals.

Higginbotham entered the Houston market in 2008 by merging with Madison Benefits Group and expanded its market presence in 2010 when Swantner & Gordon merged. Combined, Higginbotham employs more than 530 insurance and administrative professionals across Texas.

Chapman Schewe was opened in 1992. The firm’s 19 employees offer benefit and vendor/network evaluation, claim analysis, medical director advisory, pharmacy consulting, patient advocacy and program administration to employer groups with 100 to 3,000 employees.

Chapman Schewe and existing staff will continue operating under its established name from its office at 10375 Richmond Ave.

Source: Higginbotham

 

 

Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetCategories: Texas / South Central NewsHave a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk

View the Original article