Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Minnesota Court: Insurer Must Provide Benefits After Gender Change

April 6, 2012Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetArticleComments

A federal judge in Minneapolis, Minn., has ruled a health insurer improperly denied benefits to a spouse who had undergone a sex change operation.

U.S. District Judge Michael Davis said the health plan administrator for a United Parcel Service employee was wrong when it failed to cover his wife. Christine Radtke sued the health plan fund after it said she wasn’t legally married to Calvin Radtke. The fund countersued saying the couple fraudulently obtained a marriage license because Christine was born male.

The Star Tribune says Davis found the benefit plan imposed its own definitions of gender and marriage in violation of Minnesota law.

The judge’s ruling says state law recognizes a married person’s gender when the marriage takes place. Davis ordered the fund to reinstate Radtke and reimburse her for any covered expenses that she’s paid.

 

Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Email ThisPrintNewslettersTweetCategories: Midwest NewsTopics: gender bias, Health and Benefits, lawsuit, MinnesotaHave a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk

View the Original article